How the Italian unity movement was accomplished

  Unity movement in Italy

 

 Answer:

          Hundreds of divided Italy, located in the south of Europe, won to achieve national unity.  Matsini was a pioneer in Italy and the independence movement, Garibaldi was it's Aussie and Cavur was its director.  After 1815, the unification movement began in Italy.  But there was no consensus on Italy's approach to unification.  There are three special doctrines in this regard.

  First, ideological leaders such as Mazzini sought to establish an independent Italian republic through a democratic revolution.

 Second, leaders such as Gilbert introduced various Italian doctrines under the leadership of the Pope.

   After 1850, under the leadership of Kapoor, the unification of Italy was implemented based on this doctrine.

 Joseph Matsini: First Life:

      Matsini was born in 1805 in Genoa, Italy.  

        That is why at first he became a member of it.   And was cast into a castle called Sadona.   From this election, he inspired the country's movement.

       He formed a new team called "Young Italy".  

 Mazzini's aims and principles:

          Matsini loved his homeland Italy.  That is why the main purpose of his life was to unite and make an independent Italy.  His motives were progressive;  He did not want to see an autocratic monarchy established in a united independent Italy.  He was in favour of establishing a republic.  

      His principles were reflected in the Young Italy movement.  1) Although he was initially Carbonary civilized.   2) He called on the youth of Italy to become self-reliant and to expel Austria by their strength.  It was against his principles to be dependent.  His motto was "Never Rise in Any Other Name of Italy and All Italy."  3) He explicitly declared that the first duty for the unity and progress of the He believed that this duty could be performed on his strength.

         By 1833 Young Italy had gained widespread popularity.  And there is a very strong movement all over the country.  

       In all of Italy, in deep despair, Matsini gave hope.   He inspired all Italians with a new consciousness.  He dared to jump into the struggle.  Indeed, his movement was not successful, but it paved the way for the movement to form a future Italy.  Some in Italy's various political parties have called his ideology "extremely extremist."  Again, some may have described his ideology as mere madness, but ignoring all criticism, Matsini is immortalized in history today.   

 Garibaldi:

          Garibaldi was born in Nice, northern Italy.    Martini and Garibaldi were homosexuals in terms of ideology and approach.  The distance between the two was short.  Martini and Garibaldi both believed in republican ideals.  Where Cavour wanted to unite Italy under the leadership of the King of Piedmont, Garibaldi sought to establish a republican system in Italy like Mazzini.  Garibaldi's activities can be divided into two stages.

       In 1836, Garibaldi joined the Italian liberation movement.  After the failure of Young Italy's efforts, he was forced to live in exile in South America from 1836 to 1848.   And the second time he was sent to America.

     

 Step 2:

         

        Martini was an ideologue, a magician and Garibaldi was a worker, a general in the struggle.   He was a believer in the only weapon.   That is why many have had the opportunity to make such harsh remarks that his heart was like that of a lion but in intellect, he was the equivalent of a bull.  But everyone will admit that there was no gap between his patriotism and his struggle for independence;  His contribution to the Italian independence movement is not insignificant.  

 Introduction to Kavur:

      Caviar's contribution to the unification of Italy and the liberation struggle of the whole of Italy was immense.  

        But his interest in politics never waned.  He was thinking about various problems of the country as if he was getting ready for future life.  He travelled to England and France many times and observed the political and economic systems there with great devotion.  He became fascinated with individual liberty and the rule of law and dreamed of establishing it in Italy as well.  

        Two years later, he joined the cabinet.  Except for a few days in the middle, he made the unification of Italy possible by holding this responsible position until his death.

         

 Kapur's Objectives and Principles:

           He further understood that to take this leadership, his kingdom must be made suitable in all respects.  He has to become an ideal state.

    Help and support must be sought and for that, the problem of Italy must become an international problem.  

 Functions of Kavur: Phase I:

         He reorganized the military department, built the navy, developed agriculture and industry, encouraged foreign trade, and introduced many developmental reforms.  

 Step 2:

         

            He was able to put the problem of Italy in front of everyone.  He arranged for his co-operation in the war against Austria by concluding the Treaty of Plumbers with Napoleon III of France.  

      He then provoked Austria in various ways and forced them to go to war and gradually began to win.  If Napoleon III, in his interest, had settled the war with Austria alone in the middle, Italy would have made great strides towards unity.   Annoyed, the king advised Emmanuel to ignore him.  Kapur's advice was erroneous and Kavur resigned dissatisfied when the king accepted it with greater prudence.

      But within a few months, he corrected his mistake and agreed to take up the ministry again (in 1860).   The unity of Italy went a long way.

          Garibaldi was compelled to exercise restraint and leave the king in charge.  

 Caviar's achievements:

            The superiority of Kavur is in this place.   

        He moved forward infallibly towards his purpose and goal but moved forward with reality.    He had a clear idea of ​​Italy's needs, and it was clear to him which way to go.

        He did not sit and wait for the right situation, he was trying to create the right situation.  He made it possible for him to join the war in Crimea and attend the Paris meeting.  Gaining the support of Napoleon III against Austria is no less credit.  Because he first realized that Italy couldn't achieve independence without the help of any foreign power.   He did not publicly support Garibaldi's campaign in southern Italy for diplomatic reasons but secretly offered him all kinds of assistance.    He is compared only to Bismarck of Germany.

         Another idea against Kavur is that he did not build a strong and democratic system.   Italy was backward compared to other European countries.   Like Bismarck, he pursued pragmatic politics for unity.   Napoleon III and Garibaldi II were able to use Cavur for unification, so Cavur can be called the creator of modern Italy.

        He did not believe in deception.  So to make Piedmont Sardinia the leader of the unity movement, he realized the need for various reforms and followed them into action.  As director of state, Kavur also showed considerable generosity and deep knowledge.